|

Tommy Kramer has
spent over 35 years in radio as an on-air talent, Programmer, and
Talent Coach, and has worked with over 100 stations in all formats,
specializing in coaching morning team shows. He was elected to the
Texas Radio Hall of Fame in 2003.
Contact
Tommy Kramer
Voice 972-956-0609
tommy@tommykramer.net
Coaching Tips
The oddest thing seems to be
happening both on TV and in radio these days. The phony, insincere,
pukey deejay delivery is rearing its ugly head ...
(read more - Tip #1)
A lot of Program
Directors, in trying to coach an Air Talent, jump too quickly to the
second phase of coaching -- getting an aircheck, playing
samples of "things done wrong," and making the process an uneasy one
for the Talent right off the bat. No "foreplay."
(read more - Tip #2)
Think of how
many times you’ve heard an Air Talent say--more often than not, with
the sound of rustling paper or a page turning in the background--"I
was reading an article in this magazine yesterday," or "I saw in the
paper this morning that...." My problem with this sort of
thing is ... (read more - Tip #3)
I once put up a
sign on the Control Room door that said: "I just got into
town. I got into the car, turned the radio on, and hit the 'scan'
button. It landed on your station. I don't know what station it is,
what the format is, what the dial position is, or who you
are. You have thirty seconds." I base everything I
coach on "first time" listening (read
more - Tip #4)
You hear often
that someone is "funny." "He's so funny." "I love to listen to his
show because it's funny." But is it "funny," or is it "fun"
that we're talking about? There is
a difference, from a performance and planning point of view. "Funny"
is certainly "fun," but "fun" doesn't necessarily have to be
"funny." The Andy
Griffith Show was a great example of being both
(read more - Tip #5)
Think about how many Morning Teams
you’ve heard that have a decent energy level, but they just don’t
seem to move very efficiently. Frankly, in many situations, the
decision to have a Team Show in the morning overrides whether or not
a qualified team is available, or whether the PD has the proper
techniques for coaching them. If you find yourself thinking, “They
just take too long” or “They’re good, but they just talk too much,”
here’s a tip to help coordinate them fast: When the subject changes,
the person speaking changes (read
more - Tip #6)
If you want to talk about something
that isn’t local, unless it’s a giant national headline, it’s likely
that you’ll get a “who cares?” reaction in the mind of the
Listener. Whenever I hear a Talent struggle with this, I ask, “How
do I get there from here?” (read
more - Tip #7)
Many air talents, even experienced
ones, BROADcast. They speak too loudly, get overly exaggerated, and
can’t seem to sound conversational without losing energy or
enthusiasm. Usually, it’s just what they picture in their heads—the
microphone as a megaphone, a device used to talk to the listener,
somewhere in the distance. It’s the same sort of principle that
makes many stage actors, who are used to broad, exaggerated
movements, have to rein that impulse in to not appear to be chewing
the scenery and over-acting when they do film work
(read more - Tip #8)
Too often, an Air Talent wants to do
something on the air for one of the following reasons:
· "It'll be funny."
· "It'll get ratings."
· "It'll schmooze a client."
Some Program Directors or GM's might agree that these are valid
reasons. But they're not. Here's why: 1. "It'll be funny" is an
aspiration, certainly not always a reality. Trying to be “funny,”
besides being subjective, is really not the object. As anyone who
has read my stuff knows, FUN is the operative word. "Funny" MIGHT
happen, but FUN can be guaranteed if you filter it through the
Listener's lifestyle (read more -
Tip#9)
If you're going to get really
proficient at anything, you have to practice every day. Eric Clapton
is nicknamed “Slowhand” because he makes those incendiary guitar
licks look so easy. Tiger Woods and other pro golfers make the game
look effortless (indeed, even boringly easy) and crush the ball into
orbit repeatedly because they hit thousands of balls every month to
get that way. Every basketball player in the NBA can do a
“whirlybird” dunk; I try it, and I find out that (1) my vertical
leap is about three inches, and (2) I may need a liver
transplant. I’ve often coached Air Talents, particularly in Morning
Shows, who just don't want to do the MAINTENANCE. Instead, they want
to "wing it," and rely on their ability to just "come up with
something" instead of PLANNING a show
(read more - Tip #10)
It makes me cringe to hear someone
taking way too long to set up something on the air. If it doesn't
affect you the same way, it should. Weak "setup" skills are like
those people that prattle on telling overly long "shaggy dog" jokes
at a party--sooner or later, you just want to find an excuse to join
a different conversation, to avoid the five minute setup to a lame
punch line. We live in the Steven Spielberg/George Lucas,
six-second-attention-span, "jump-cut" generation. Movie trailers,
commercials, ESPN Sportscenter, "Best of" CD's, CNN Headline
News--they're all geared to not waste a person's valuable time. You
OWE it to your Listener to get to the POINT. Right NOW!
(read more - Tip #11)
As you
know if you have an on-air job opening, finding talent with real
skills who can also be adaptable and fit in is a huge challenge.
With the best of intentions, I keep hearing the word “teachable”
from Program Directors looking at candidates for job openings at
their stations. While “Is he teachable?” may appear to be a prime
component, it’s also coming from the wrong end of the binoculars, a
template of the PD’s hopes that he or she lays over the process of
considering someone.
So here’s a suggestion. Let's replace the word "teachable" in our
vocabulary with the phrase "wants to learn more."
(read more - Tip #12)
People usually
try to do too much with promos, especially morning show promos. They
get too complicated and full of "marketing your aspirations." The
promos should be very simple, the "free sample" type. So use this
template:
1. Short open: "Mornings with Ted and Tracy....."
2. Audio clip from the show
3. Short tag: "Ted and Tracy, weekday mornings 6 to 10, on 102.9,
The Frog."
Do not put in "and on the next show....." stuff
(read more - Tip #13)
There's a great moment in the movie "What's Up, Doc?" with Ryan
O'Neal and Barbra Streisand. After a series of misadventures, he
says to her, "It's not that I don't like you. It’s just that you're
just so.......different." To
which she replies, "From now on, I'll try to be the same." Cute line, but it got me to thinking about the little ways to keep
things fresh on the air. Are you the same, or different, in
what you do on the air each day?
(read more - Tip #14) |
One Thing at a Time
Tommy Kramer Coaching Tip #44
(listen to the MP3 audio version of
#44 by clicking here)
Whenever you get
down about anything on your station, turn on the TV. Television does
so many things wrong that you can’t help but feel better about your
radio product after watching them prattle on about stuff their
Viewers couldn’t possibly care about, and spend most of their time
telling the Viewer that they’ll “be right back” or that something
will happen “after we take a break.” Aaaaaarrrrggghhh.
TV people also
seem to assume that we’re keeping notes on the entire lineup, so
they promote three or four shows at a time—when in reality, we just
want to be reminded of when American Idol is on.
You hear a lot
of Air Talents with the same mentality, promoting a “laundry list”
of things to listen for later. This, of course, DOES NOT WORK. What
you want to do is tell me (the Listener) the NEXT thing that I might
actually care to listen for, and a definite Time Line on when I can
hear it. PROMOTE ONE THING AT A TIME. The more things you promote,
the less I care about any of them. (Plus, you can’t make people
listen for a longer period of time than they have available. So stop
trying.)
By the same
token, you want to DO one thing at a time. A set that starts with
something, then takes a phone call about something else, then
returns to the original thing, is just too difficult to follow.
And remember
that multiple phone calls strung together dilute one another.
Unless it’s a very quick “yes or no” response, ONE good call at a
time is all you want to run. (Another way to look at it is whenever
a STORY is told, no matter how short, just run that one call.)
Besides the
formatic elements, obviously, ANY two things done in one break are
only 50% as effective as they could be if they were done in two
separate breaks, because they compete with each other in the
Listener’s mind.
Cleaning things
up and getting down to promoting, then doing, one thing at a time,
leads to a far more effective and “digestible” pattern for the
Listener. It’s not a matter of how long a break is. It’s about how
long it FEELS.
tommy@tommykramer.net
© 2007 Tommy Kramer
All Rights Reserved
Contact Tommy Kramer for permission to reprint or distribute
content of this Web site.
Besides the bad habit of
not staying singular, and talking to one person (by saying silly,
unfocused things like “the audience,” “our listeners,” “if any of
you…” or “some of you”), every day, I hear deejays, news people,
weather people, and traffic people using “words that push the
listener away.” (read more - Tip #15)
When you go to
McDonald's for lunch, you don't want a seven course meal. You want
to get your burger and fries and go! It's not that you don't enjoy a
big meal once in a while. It's just that, in a hectic work day, fast
food is all you have time to consume. And yet I still hear morning
deejays in music formats doing long Artist interviews while people
are getting ready for work, getting the kids' lunches made, driving
in traffic, and talking on cell phones. Why? (read more - Tip #16)
First of all,
let me make it clear that there are show prep services nowadays that
are miles above what the standard used to be. With the right service
now, you get all the clips from American Idol, for instance, or
political speeches, and other media highlights delivered to you on a
platter, making your job very easy to stay topical, and saving you a
lot of dubbing from the shows you used to have to tape and excerpt
clips from yourself. These services can be like having a Producer. But even then,
that’s just a starting point. Even with the best prep sheets, you
have to come up with your own “camera angle,” and have the
“destination” of the break be something that only you would
say (read more - Tip #17)
Some things are said--and a few of them with the best of
intentions--that do nothing for you. The truth is that intentions
don’t matter. If I step on your foot, then apologize for it, that’s
nice of me, and it was well-intentioned, but it doesn’t stop your
foot from hurting. So even though you mean well, as if it’s
going to “catch me up” somehow to say “Off mic, we were talking
about x….” or “Before we got on the air, we were talking about x….”
it doesn’t put any points on the board. It just refers to a time
when I WASN’T LISTENING. So I don’t care. Remember, time flows in
ONE direction for the Listener—from this moment, right now, FORWARD.
Referring back, or referring to something I couldn’t even hear, is
pointless (read more - Tip #18)
It seems like
multi-station ownership has brought a "bottom line" mentality to
everything. "All they care about is the bottom line" is said about
every major radio company nowadays. And stations in every market
jostle for what they perceive to be the strongest "bottom line"
positions to their Listeners. But do they have any real interest
for--or meaning to—the Listener? Here are some examples.
· "The At-Work Station." (Isn't it possible that this has come to
mean "the blandest music, so the boss won't bitch about it"
station?)
· "Favorites of Yesterday and Today." (Invalidated with the first
song I hear that I can't stand.)
(read more - Tip #19)
Don't you just
hate it when someone on a music station has an interview with a
guest or an artist, and all of a sudden, the radio station and the
host just turn into shills for the record industry? What could
possibly be more boring than those "So, when does the new album come
out?" and "Where's the next stop on your tour?" questions, and their
lame, predictable answers. Don't settle for that pap
(read more - Tip #20)
It seems
sometimes like we have an entire generation of air Talents that
insist on asking the Listener questions on the air in the way they
phrase things. This ancient and weird habit also invades commercial
copy ("Do you want a great deal on a new car?"), and promo copy. I’m
convinced that questions are the death of radio. Especially those
little rhetorical questions, like ending a line with “Right?” or
“Okay?” or “sound good to you?” If you need my response, you’re out
of luck. I’m busy. In my seminars, I illustrate how silly this is
with these two rhetorical questions:
· Why do people ask rhetorical questions?
· And do they expect an answer? (read
more - Tip #21)
I couldn’t
believe it. Here we are in 2007, and I’m hearing a morning team do
the ancient “What women say, versus what women really mean” thing.
(You know, when the husband says, “Can’t you pick up the kids?” and
her answer is a clipped, “Fine.” Which, of course, doesn’t mean
“fine.” Then he says, “What’s wrong?” and gets an even more clipped,
“Nothing!” as a response. Etc.) (read more - Tip #22)
Arthur Penn, the
director of movies such as "Little Big Man" and "Bonnie and Clyde,"
is known for getting what he calls "happy accidents" on film. Little
things that happen unplanned during the filming of scenes that have
become golden moments in his pictures. Part of the
reason for this is that he doesn't over-rehearse scenes with the
actors. He prefers to hear the dialogue fresh with the camera
rolling, and uses a lot of first or second "takes," even if a line
is left out or a different physical movement occurs than what was
called for in the screenplay. The key here is not that he
doesn't have a lot of rehearsal (read
more - Tip #23)
It's easy to
confuse the words "pace" and "momentum." They are used almost
interchangeably, but do not mean the same thing. Pace is how fast
you go. But momentum is about how straight a line there is from
Point "A" to Point "B." Clutter, no matter what the pace is, defeats
momentum. Too many things done real fast are still just too many
things. As a matter of fact, it's almost worse to do them real fast,
because then you just sound like another quacking, fast-talking
"cartoon deejay."
(read more - Tip #24)
Here's a tip
that has nothing to do with any specific formatics, but applies to
all formats. My wife has a
wonderfully simplistic way of listening to the radio. For her, no
one is worth listening to if they don't sound like they're having
fun on the air--like they're genuinely interested in what
they're doing, and like having their job. The old saying
is that people who are interested are interesting
(read
more - Tip #25)
As we say in the
South, this here's what you call your basic Zen thing. A lot of
people, including a lot of Program Directors, talk about
"concentration." You see football and basketball coaches pleading
with their players to "bear down and concentrate." Baloney.
"Bearing down" to will yourself through mental clutter and
"concentrate" is stressful, exhausting, and doesn't work. Zen
masters, experts at karate and great musicians and athletes say that
they do their best when they simply isolate a thought, and
allow all other thoughts to just melt away
(read more - Tip #26)
Gary Larson, the
creator of The Far Side comics, had a great two-panel cartoon. The
first panel was titled, "What we say to dogs." A guy scolding his
dog was saying, "Okay, Ginger! I've had it! You stay out of the
garbage! Understand, Ginger? Stay out of the garbage, or else!" The
second panel was titled, "What they hear." Same drawing--the guy
pointing his finger at the dog, but the dog is hearing him say,
"Blah blah GINGER blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah GINGER
blah blah blah blah blah." Yes, this does apply to the Listener--you
do have to be talking about things that your Listener CARES about
(read
more - Tip #27)
Even though I
coach radio Talent, I often reference TV shows as examples. So think
about this: From Andy Griffith, Bob Newhart and Mary Tyler Moore to
Seinfield, Frazier, and “Everybody Loves Raymond,” all these shows
featured a lead character who quite often (in some instances, almost
always) gave the punch lines to one of the other cast members. And
it just made them and their shows that much more likeable, because
of the lack of ego that the viewer felt from the "star." (read
more - Tip #28)
Radio legend
Gordon McLendon once said that the only purpose of doing contests
and giveaways at all was to make great promos. NBA Hall of
Famer Bill Russell said that his great Boston Celtics teams wanted
to win every game--every pre-season game, every
regular-season game, and every playoff game. Obviously, that's not
really possible, but thinking like that enabled them to win ELEVEN
championships in thirteen years! So, with those two thoughts in
mind, let me give you a simple thing to go for
(read more - Tip #29) |
Once in a while, you'll have a charity auction, a grateful contest
winner, traffic information, or a serious story to handle on the
air. Instead of the all-too-typical "flippant disc jockey
insincerity thing," play it for all it's worth. Straight ahead,
positive, human, sincere. Not overplayed, no “winking at the
audience” to let them know that you’re “hipper” than the material.
Just real and down to earth (read
more - Tip #30)
It seems so easy
to hear the mistakes your competitor makes--the things he or she
does that are dumb, not thought out well, phony-sounding, pukey,
lame, irritating or obvious. So why can't we hear ourselves the same
way? It's because we know it's us. Someone we like. Someone we root
for and want to succeed (read more -
Tip #31)
... That's why too many Talents resort to "kicker" stories and "News of
the Weird." If this kind of stuff is a “crutch” for you, then you
need to change the way you’re thinking. This pap isn’t what the
listener really wants to hear. It’s mental tofu, passing through
with no impact at all; just filling time.) Your job as a
Talent isn’t to try and be the sun; it’s to “be the moon” and ...
(read more -
Tip #32)
It seems like
the thing most air talents struggle with is show prep. I’m not
talking about station events and promotions, contests, etc. What I’m
referring to is what should make your show unique. The
personal reflections and “camera angles” that shape your Content.
The default settings seem to be three main headings
(read more -
Tip #33)
You've got a
great bit going. The phone lines are lit up. You and the Listeners
have each had funny or poignant lines about the subject. When do you
stop? A lot of Air
Talents won't stop. They'll continue to take--and air--phone
calls as long as they keep coming in. This is almost always a
mistake. In radiation terminology, things have a "half-life,"
meaning that even though it continues to exist, it loses energy or
becomes dangerous past a certain point
(read more -
Tip #34)
Here’s a tip for
PD’s trying to become better at coaching Talent. Here's what your
Talent doesn't need to hear: "You had a good show today"...or "You
guys were really funny this morning" or "Need to pick the pace up a
little bit." These types of non-specific comments, even
well-intentioned, are too vague to result in any real progress.
Remember that Air Talents, if they're really good (or if they're
ever going to BECOME really good), are like musicians
(read more -
Tip #35)
This is another
tip for PD’s, but if you’re not a Program Director, just put
yourself in the Talent’s seat. You've just hired a new Air Talent.
How do you get him or her off to a good start? Remember that it
takes a long time to undo a first impression (if it can be done at
all). So help your new person avoid overdoing it the first few days
or weeks (read more -
Tip #36)
I just saw a TV
commercial with Bob Villa, former host of “This Old House,” now a
male Martha Stewart-type icon. Seems the premise is that Bob’s going
to visit a couple who’ve just bought their first house. As he walks
up the driveway, they greet him and say they have a whole bunch of
jobs to finish, to which Bob answers, “Craftsman Tools can
help!” They reacted with stupid, carefully staged grins and typical
ad copy responses, but I wanted them to say, “Well, Bob, we really
didn’t ask what brand of wrench would work best. We just hoped you’d
volunteer to get off your overly successful butt and lend a hand
here.” So here’s the lesson ... (read more -
Tip #37)
So much is the
exact opposite of what its name implies. ("Military Intelligence"
comes to mind.) The people that use your station are called
"listeners." But "listeners" don't actually listen very much. As
much as we'd like to not believe this, the radio is an appliance,
like a light bulb or a microwave oven. We can't really expect them
to listen intently to everything we do. That's why Research can be
misleading--because listeners will say one thing, but do another.
It's not because they aren't telling the truth. It's just that
Research tends to ask them what they want to listen to, when in
reality, they don't listen, they don't think, they just react to
what they hear (read more -
Tip #38)
In a previous
tip, we discussed the fact that your "Listener" doesn't really
LISTEN very much. He/she uses radio as a mood service appliance, an
Information source, or (hopefully) an Entertainment medium. But the
Listener is rarely just sitting listening to the radio. It's usually
in conjunction with something else--working, driving, backyard
barbecue, etc. I've heard many dedicated Air Talents say that they
want to MAKE the Listener THINK about something or MAKE the Listener
PAY ATTENTION to something. This can't be done
(read more -
Tip #39)
Think about
this. I'm tuning in NOW. I didn't HEAR what you did a minute and a
half ago. So if you refer back to it without some sort of
explanation, I DON'T GET IT. We tend to think of our shows as being
linear, with the Listener tuning at the beginning, and listening
until the end. But in reality, the Listener comes in NOW or tunes
out NOW. That's why you have to "reset the stage" every couple of
minutes for the NEW Listener (read
more - Tip #40)
One of the
things we all try to get our Air Talents to do is be more LOCAL on
the air. Recently, as I talked about this with one of the members of
a Morning Team, he had a reaction that really made me think. He said
that this was something that they'd heard from the station's
consultant and the PD and the GM before, but that he had some
difficulty seeing how it could be done on days when there really
wasn't much of anything local to talk about
(read
more - Tip #41)
This is
one of the main two or three things I coach, and one of the
most misunderstood. It’s appalling how many people give
weak, vague or indefinite Time Lines when they’re promoting
something. It’s kind of like the auditions on “American
Idol.” Everybody thinks they do it well, but very few
actually do (read
more - Tip #42)
At one time,
Jerry Lee Lewis was one of the fastest rising stars in the rock
world—second only to Elvis. He’d done the rock & roll anthems “Whole
Lotta Shakin’ Goin’ On” and “Great Balls of Fire.” He gave great,
high-energy live shows, the girls screamed with delight when they
saw him, and guys thought he was the coolest thing going. He had the
hair, the voice, the talent and the momentum.
Then he made a critical error (read
more - Tip #43)
|
|